Recovering Social Networks by Observing Votes

نویسندگان

  • Benjamin Fish
  • Yi Huang
  • Lev Reyzin
چکیده

We investigate how to reconstruct social networks from voting data. In particular, given a voting model that considers social network structure, we aim to find the network that best explains the agents’ votes. We study two plausible voting models, one edge-centric and the other vertex-centric. For these models, we give algorithms and lower bounds, characterizing cases where network recovery is possible and where it is computationally difficult. We also test our algorithms on United States Senate data. Despite the similarity of the two models, we show that their respective network recovery problems differ in complexity and involve distinct algorithmic challenges. Moreover, the networks produced when working under these models can also differ significantly. These results indicate that great care should be exercised when choosing a voting model for network recovery tasks.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Ranked Voting on Social Networks

Classic social choice literature assumes that votes are independent (but possibly conditioned on an underlying objective ground truth). This assumption is unrealistic in settings where the voters are connected via an underlying social network structure, as social interactions lead to correlated votes. We establish a general framework — based on random utility theory — for ranked voting on a soc...

متن کامل

Voting with Social Networks: Truth Springs from Argument Amongst Friends

In certain voting problems, a central authority must infer a hidden ground truth by aggregating the opinions of an electorate. When individual assessments are drawn i.i.d. and are correct with probability p > 0.5, aggregating enough votes will yield the ground truth with high probability. However, in reality voters’ opinions are often influenced by those of their friends. In certain social netw...

متن کامل

The Spread of Opinions and Proportional Voting

Election results are determined by numerous social factors that affect the formation of opinion of the voters, including the network of interactions between them and the dynamics of opinion influence. In this work we study the result of proportional elections using an opinion dynamics model similar to simple opinion spreading over a complex network. ErdősRényi, Barabási-Albert, regular lattices...

متن کامل

A Sequential Voting with Externalities: Herding in Social Networks

We study sequential voting with two alternatives, in a setting with utility externalities: as usual, each voter has a private preference over the candidates and likes her favorite candidate to win, but additionally, a voter values voting for the chosen winner (which is determined by the majority or super-majority of votes). This model aims to capture voting behavior (”likes”) in social networks...

متن کامل

Sybil-Resilient Online Content Rating

Obtaining user feedback (using votes) is essential in ranking user-generated online content. However, any online voting system is susceptible to the Sybil attack where adversaries can out-vote real users by creating several Sybil identities. In this paper, we present SumUp, a Sybilresilient online content rating system that leverages trust networks among users to defend against Sybil attacks wi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016